Skip to main content

Social Security Administration Awards Disability Benefits Based On Claimant's Fibromyalgia

On January 11, 2016, Administrative Law Judge Richard J. Ortiz-Valero entered a decision awarding disability insurance benefits and finding that due to her fibromyalgia the claimant was disabled under sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the Social Security Act.  The decision is significant in that fibromyalgia is not a "listed" impairment under the Social Security Administration's regulations.

These regulations, 20 C.F.R. Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1, list many of the most readily diagnosed medical conditions and their symptoms which can reach a severity which is considered disabling.  In the usual case, in order to award benefits the Social Security Administration must determine that the claimant's impairment is of a severity to meet or medically equal the criteria of a "listed" impairment.

This claimant's condition had been diagnosed by several physicians as fibromyalgia ("FM").  FM affects the muscles and soft tissues.  Symptoms include chronic muscle pain, fatigue, sleep problems and painful "tender points." Fibromyalgia Center: Symptoms, Treatments, Causes, Tests, and ...

CDC estimates that as many as 15 million people may suffer from this condition.

Even though it is not a "listed" disease, the Social Security Administration has issued guidelines on how it will determine whether a claimant's FM is a disabling impairment qualifying the claimant for benefits.  SSR 12-2p  Essentially the claimant's "residual functional capacity" must be evaluated i.e. her ability to do physical and mental work activities on a sustained basis, despite limitations from her impairment.

In order to show that the claimant was disabled in this care we used the SSR 12-p guidelines to formulate a questionnaire which we sent to each of the physicians who had treated the claimant.
Among other things the questionnaire included a diagram of the eighteen (18) trigger points shown in the SSR 12-2p guidelines.  We asked the physician to describe at how many trigger points the claimant usually experienced pain.  The questionnaire also provided for an evaluation of the various activities - walking, lifting, bending, etc. - the claimant could perform so that her functional capacity could be determined.

The Administrative Law Judge determined that the claimant's residual functional capacity was less than that needed to perform her past relevant work activities and precluded other work as well.  As a result the ALJ found her to be disabled and qualified for benefits.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Rehabilitation Act Now Protects TSA Officers From Discrimination Based On A Disability

The Rehabilitation Act protects most federal employees from discrimination because of a disability, just as the Americans With Disabilities Act protects those who work in the private sector.   The Rehabilitation Act requires federal agencies to provide reasonable accommodation to applicants and employees who have a disability but who are otherwise qualified for the position sought or held by them.  As amended, the Act now expressly incorporates the standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act.  For all practical purposes the essential requirements of these two statutes are identical.  The U.S. Congress hastily created the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in response to the terrorist attacks of 9/11/2001.  TSA has always contended that the Rehabilitation Act does not apply to its security screeners - the officers who screen passengers and their luggage for weapons and explosives at airports throughout the U.S. The Aviation and Transportation ...

Federal Employee's Request for Reasonable Accommodation is a Protected Activity - Agency May Not Retaliate

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §701 et seq., protects a federal worker from discrimination because he or she has a disability.  The Act requires agencies to provide reasonable accommodation to an individual's physical or mental disabilities unless the agency can prove that the requested accommodation will create an undue hardship.  In this regard the Act incorporates the protections afforded under the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended, which includes more recent and more detailed requirements.  Accommodation may involve the removal of physical barriers.  It may also include job restructuring and part-time or modified work schedules.  Thus, a flexible work schedule may qualify as a reasonable accommodation. Both laws expressly prohibit employers from taking retaliatory actions against employees who oppose acts or practices which are made unlawful, for making charges and/or for participating in related investigations or proceedings. ...

OSHA Protects Workers Who Object to Unsafe Working Conditions

Section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act protects employees from reprisals for exercising their rights under the Act, including their right to complain about unsafe or unhealthy working conditions. It provides in general that no person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee because the employee has: (a) Filed any complaint under or related to the Act; (b) Instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or related to the Act; (c) Testified or is about to testify in any proceeding under the Act or related to the Act; or (d) Exercised on his own behalf or on behalf of others any right afforded by the Act. An employee who believes that he has been discriminated against in violation of section 11(c) of the Act may, within 30 days after such violation occurs, lodge a complaint with the Secretary of Labor alleging such violation. The Secretary shall then cause appropriate investigation to be made. If, as a result of such investi...