Skip to main content

Federal Employee's Request for Reasonable Accommodation is a Protected Activity - Agency May Not Retaliate

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §701 et seq., protects a federal worker from discrimination because he or she has a disability.  The Act requires agencies to provide reasonable accommodation to an individual's physical or mental disabilities unless the agency can prove that the requested accommodation will create an undue hardship.  In this regard the Act incorporates the protections afforded under the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended, which includes more recent and more detailed requirements.  Accommodation may involve the removal of physical barriers.  It may also include job restructuring and part-time or modified work schedules.  Thus, a flexible work schedule may qualify as a reasonable accommodation.

Both laws expressly prohibit employers from taking retaliatory actions against employees who oppose acts or practices which are made unlawful, for making charges and/or for participating in related investigations or proceedings.  It is also unlawful to coerce, intimidate, threaten or interfere with any individual in the exercise or enjoyment of rights granted or protected by either Act.  In Solomon v. Vilsack, 763 F.3d 1 (DC Cir. 2014) the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit further extended a federal worker's protection against reprisals for seeking to vindicate her rights under the Rehabilitation Act.  It held that her request for accommodation - in this case, her request to continue a flexible work schedule - was itself a protected activity.  She could recover damages for unlawful retaliation if she could prove that the agency took any adverse action because of her request.

Thus, the agency supervisor may have unlawfully retaliated against the employee by revoking the employee's permission to work on a flexible work schedule after she requested reasonable accommodation.

In a subsequent case a district court in D.C. also noted that an "adverse action" for this purpose would be any action which could reasonably be expected to deter an employee from exercising her rights under the Act.  Where a State Department employee alleged she received an unwarranted warning letter after she requested accommodations to her various medical conditions the district court held that she could pursue a claim of unlawful retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act.  See Sanders v. Kerry, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75567, 180 F. Supp. 3d 35 (decided March 16, 2016).

Consistent with Solomon v. Vilsack, the Eleventh Circuit has also held that a request for accommodation constitutes protected activity for which retaliation is prohibited under both the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Florida Civil Rights Act. See Frazier-White v. Gee 818 F.3d 1249, 1258 (11th Cir. 2016).


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Rehabilitation Act Now Protects TSA Officers From Discrimination Based On A Disability

The Rehabilitation Act protects most federal employees from discrimination because of a disability, just as the Americans With Disabilities Act protects those who work in the private sector.   The Rehabilitation Act requires federal agencies to provide reasonable accommodation to applicants and employees who have a disability but who are otherwise qualified for the position sought or held by them.  As amended, the Act now expressly incorporates the standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act.  For all practical purposes the essential requirements of these two statutes are identical.  The U.S. Congress hastily created the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in response to the terrorist attacks of 9/11/2001.  TSA has always contended that the Rehabilitation Act does not apply to its security screeners - the officers who screen passengers and their luggage for weapons and explosives at airports throughout the U.S. The Aviation and Transportation ...
1 comment
Read more

Circumstantial Evidence of Age and Race Discrimination

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit vacated a district court’s order granting summary judgment to the employer in a case alleging age and race discrimination, Kilgore v. Trussville Development, LLC dab Hilton Garden, Inc., 2016 U.S.app. LEXIS 5464; 646 Fed. Apps. 765 (11th Cir. 2016).  The text of the decision can be found at https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3188580/valarie-kay-kilgore-v-trussville-development-llc/ Ms. Kilgore presented circumstantial evidence which supported an inference that the employer’s claim that she was fired for being rude to guests was a pretext.  She presented evidence that she was replaced by two newly hired employees who were younger and African-American - Ms. Kilgore was a Caucasian woman in her sixties.  In addition, her superiors had made derogatory statements about her age (that she was “a stubborn old woman” and “too old”) and also about her race (that she was “the wrong color.”  Such comments are circumsta...
Post a Comment
Read more

Social Security Administration Awards Disability Benefits Based On Claimant's Fibromyalgia

On January 11, 2016, Administrative Law Judge Richard J. Ortiz-Valero entered a decision awarding disability insurance benefits and finding that due to her fibromyalgia the claimant was disabled under sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the Social Security Act.  The decision is significant in that fibromyalgia is not a "listed" impairment under the Social Security Administration's regulations. These regulations, 20 C.F.R. Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1, list many of the most readily diagnosed medical conditions and their symptoms which can reach a severity which is considered disabling.  In the usual case, in order to award benefits the Social Security Administration must determine that the claimant's impairment is of a severity to meet or medically equal the criteria of a "listed" impairment. This claimant's condition had been diagnosed by several physicians as fibromyalgia ("FM").  FM affects the muscles and soft tissues.  Symptoms include chr...
Post a Comment
Read more