Skip to main content

Circumstantial Evidence of Age and Race Discrimination

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit vacated a district court’s order granting summary judgment to the employer in a case alleging age and race discrimination, Kilgore v. Trussville Development, LLC dab Hilton Garden, Inc., 2016 U.S.app. LEXIS 5464; 646 Fed. Apps. 765 (11th Cir. 2016).  The text of the decision can be found at https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3188580/valarie-kay-kilgore-v-trussville-development-llc/


Ms. Kilgore presented circumstantial evidence which supported an inference that the employer’s claim that she was fired for being rude to guests was a pretext.  She presented evidence that she was replaced by two newly hired employees who were younger and African-American - Ms. Kilgore was a Caucasian woman in her sixties.  In addition, her superiors had made derogatory statements about her age (that she was “a stubborn old woman” and “too old”) and also about her race (that she was “the wrong color.”  Such comments are circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent as the Court had previously held in Mora v. Jackson Memorial Foundation, 597 F.3d 1201, 1204 (11th Cir. 2010) (age discrimination) and Ross v. Rhodes Furniture, Inc., 146 F.3d 1286, 1291 (11th Cir. 1998) (racial remarks).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Rehabilitation Act Now Protects TSA Officers From Discrimination Based On A Disability

The Rehabilitation Act protects most federal employees from discrimination because of a disability, just as the Americans With Disabilities Act protects those who work in the private sector.   The Rehabilitation Act requires federal agencies to provide reasonable accommodation to applicants and employees who have a disability but who are otherwise qualified for the position sought or held by them.  As amended, the Act now expressly incorporates the standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act.  For all practical purposes the essential requirements of these two statutes are identical.  The U.S. Congress hastily created the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in response to the terrorist attacks of 9/11/2001.  TSA has always contended that the Rehabilitation Act does not apply to its security screeners - the officers who screen passengers and their luggage for weapons and explosives at airports throughout the U.S. The Aviation and Transportation ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Federal Employee's Request for Reasonable Accommodation is a Protected Activity - Agency May Not Retaliate

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §701 et seq., protects a federal worker from discrimination because he or she has a disability.  The Act requires agencies to provide reasonable accommodation to an individual's physical or mental disabilities unless the agency can prove that the requested accommodation will create an undue hardship.  In this regard the Act incorporates the protections afforded under the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended, which includes more recent and more detailed requirements.  Accommodation may involve the removal of physical barriers.  It may also include job restructuring and part-time or modified work schedules.  Thus, a flexible work schedule may qualify as a reasonable accommodation. Both laws expressly prohibit employers from taking retaliatory actions against employees who oppose acts or practices which are made unlawful, for making charges and/or for participating in related investigations or proceedings. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

OSHA Protects Workers Who Object to Unsafe Working Conditions

Section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act protects employees from reprisals for exercising their rights under the Act, including their right to complain about unsafe or unhealthy working conditions. It provides in general that no person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee because the employee has: (a) Filed any complaint under or related to the Act; (b) Instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or related to the Act; (c) Testified or is about to testify in any proceeding under the Act or related to the Act; or (d) Exercised on his own behalf or on behalf of others any right afforded by the Act. An employee who believes that he has been discriminated against in violation of section 11(c) of the Act may, within 30 days after such violation occurs, lodge a complaint with the Secretary of Labor alleging such violation. The Secretary shall then cause appropriate investigation to be made. If, as a result of such investi...
Post a Comment
Read more