Skip to main content

On rehearing Eleventh Circuit Re-affirms Overtime Exemption For Airport Shuttle Drivers

With only a minor change to one footnote in its original opinion, the Eleventh Circuit reaffirmed its earlier decision that airport shuttle drivers were exempt from the overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act.  The so-called Motor Carrier Exemption applies when the employee's hours are subject to regulation by the Secretary of Transportation, whether or not they are actually regulated.  The Court held that airport shuttle drivers who transported passengers between the airport (or ship terminal) and their hotel as part of a pre-booked and pre-paid interstate trip fell within this exemption.  Even though they never actually travelled out-of-state the drivers were engaged in transporting passengers in interstate commerce; accordingly the Secretary of Transportation had the statutory power to regulate their work hours.  They were therefore within scope of the Motor Carrier Exemption and were not entitled to receive overtime compensation.


Read the decision in Abel v. Southern Shuttle Services, Inc. here:  http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Federal Employee's Request for Reasonable Accommodation is a Protected Activity - Agency May Not Retaliate

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §701 et seq., protects a federal worker from discrimination because he or she has a disability.  The Act requires agencies to provide reasonable accommodation to an individual's physical or mental disabilities unless the agency can prove that the requested accommodation will create an undue hardship.  In this regard the Act incorporates the protections afforded under the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended, which includes more recent and more detailed requirements.  Accommodation may involve the removal of physical barriers.  It may also include job restructuring and part-time or modified work schedules.  Thus, a flexible work schedule may qualify as a reasonable accommodation. Both laws expressly prohibit employers from taking retaliatory actions against employees who oppose acts or practices which are made unlawful, for making charges and/or for participating in related investigations or proceedings. ...

Indirect Proof of Discrimination

Title VII cases often are resolved without a trial.  Whether the District Court properly entered summary judgment for the employer is the subject of many Eleventh Circuit appeals.  A significant decision, Smith v. Lockheed-Martin Corp., 644 F.3d 1321 (11th Cir. 2011) held that a triable issue of fact exists if the record, viewed in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, presents "a convincing mosaic of circumstantial evidence that would allow a jury to infer intentional discrimination by the decision maker."  And it is well-settled that if a plaintiff presents a prima facie case together with evidence tending to discredit the employer's proffered reasons for the alleged discriminatory action the trier of fact may reasonably conclude that the employer intentionally discriminated.  See Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, 530 U.S. 133 (2000) in which the U.S. Supreme Court so held, stating specifically that no additional evidence of discrimination is needed to...

OSHA Protects Workers Who Object to Unsafe Working Conditions

Section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act protects employees from reprisals for exercising their rights under the Act, including their right to complain about unsafe or unhealthy working conditions. It provides in general that no person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee because the employee has: (a) Filed any complaint under or related to the Act; (b) Instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or related to the Act; (c) Testified or is about to testify in any proceeding under the Act or related to the Act; or (d) Exercised on his own behalf or on behalf of others any right afforded by the Act. An employee who believes that he has been discriminated against in violation of section 11(c) of the Act may, within 30 days after such violation occurs, lodge a complaint with the Secretary of Labor alleging such violation. The Secretary shall then cause appropriate investigation to be made. If, as a result of such investi...